Identification of Factors Associated with Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs That Preferentially Match Students Who Performed an Elective Rotation Before the Interview Process.

Introduction: The role of elective rotations in the orthopaedic residency selection process varies between programs. Our study aims to identify factors associated with residency programs that interview and match a greater proportion of applicants who have completed an elective rotation with their program. Methods: Data were collected through the American Orthopaedic Association's Orthopaedic Residency Information Network database. Bivariate correlations and multivariate regression models were used to identify independent predictors of programs with a greater proportion of interviewees or residents who completed an elective rotation at the respective program. Results: One hundred seventy-eight of the 218 existing residency programs were included in this study. Programs that offered fewer interviews and more away rotation positions per year were associated with a greater odds of its interviewees (OR = 0.36, p = 0.01; OR = 4.55, p < 0.001, respectively) and residents (OR = 0.44, p = 0.04; OR = 4.23, p < 0.001, respectively) having completed an elective rotation with the program. In addition, programs with fewer attendings (OR = 0.39, p = 0.03) and in-person interviews (OR = 3.04, p = 0.04) matched a greater proportion of their rotators. However, programs that interviewed applicants during the elective rotation were less likely to match their rotators (OR = 0.35, p = 0.04). Conclusion: Certain program characteristics independently predict the likelihood of a program interviewing and matching their rotators. These findings may provide information for applicants and programs regarding the rotation process. Level of Evidence: III.

Very Few ACGME-accredited Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs Have Web-accessible Leave Policies Dedicated to Parental Leave for Residents, Despite ACGME Requirements.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires that all graduate medical education (GME) programs provide at least 6 paid weeks off for medical, parental, and caregiver leave to residents. However, it is unclear whether all orthopaedic residency programs have adapted to making specific parental leave policies web-accessible since the ACGME's mandate in 2022. This gap in policy knowledge leaves both prospective and current residents in the dark when it comes to choosing residency programs, and knowing what leave benefits they are entitled to when having children during training via birth, surrogacy, adoption, or legal guardianship. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What percentage of ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs provide accessible parental leave policies on their program's website, their GME website, and through direct contact with their program's administration? (2) What percentage of programs offer specific parental leave policies, generic leave policies, or defer to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)? METHODS: As indicated in the American Medical Association's 2022 Freida Specialty Guide, 207 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic residency programs were listed. After further evaluation using previous literature's exclusion criteria, 37 programs were excluded based on osteopathic graduate rates. In all, 170 ACGME-accredited allopathic orthopaedic surgery residency programs were identified and included in this study. Three independent reviewers assessed each program website for the presence of an accessible parental leave policy. Each reviewer accessed the program's public webpage initially, and if no parental leave policy was available, they searched the institution's GME webpage. If no policy was found online, the program administrator was contacted directly via email and phone. Available leave policies were further classified into five categories by reviewers: parental leave, generic leave, deferred to FMLA, combination of parental and FMLA, and combination of parental and generic leave. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that 6% (10 of 170) of orthopaedic residency programs had policy information available on their program's main orthopaedic web page. Fifty nine-percent (101 of 170) of orthopaedic residency programs had a clearly stated policy on their institution's GME website. The remaining 35% (59 of 170) had no information on their public website and required direct communication with program administration to obtain policy information. After directly contacting program administration, 12% (21 of 170) of programs responded to researchers request with a PDF explicitly outlining their policy. Twenty-two percent (38 of 170) of programs did not have an accessible policy available. Of the programs that had available policies, a total of 53% (70 of 132) of programs were categorized as offering explicit parental leave policies, 9% (12 of 132) were categorized as offering general leave policies, and 27% (36 of 132) deferred to FMLA. Seven percent (9 of 132) offered combined parental leave policies with FMLA, and 4% (5 of 132) offered combined general leave policies with FMLA. CONCLUSION: Although most ACGME-accredited allopathic orthopaedic surgery residency programs met the ACGME requirement of written parental leave policies in 2023, a small minority of programs have clear, accessible parental leave policies provided on their webpage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Parental leave policies should be easily accessible to prospective and current trainees and should clearly state compensation and length of leave. Ensuring orthopaedic surgery residency programs provide accessible and transparent parental leave policies is important for maintaining diversity in prospective applicants and supporting the work-life balance of current residents.

Correlation between research productivity during and after orthopaedic surgery training.

Background: Research experience is mandatory for all Orthopaedic Surgery residency programs. Although the allocation of required protected time and resources varies from program to program, the underlying importance of research remains consistent with mutual benefit to both residents and the program and faculty. Authorship and publications have become the standard metric used to evaluate academic success. This study aimed to determine if there is a correlation between the research productivity of Orthopaedic Surgery trainees and their subsequent research productivity as attending Orthopaedic Surgeons. Methods: Using the University of Mississippi Orthopaedic Residency Program Research Productivity Rank List, 30 different Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs were analyzed for the names of every graduating surgeon in their 2013 class. PubMed Central was used to screen all 156 physicians and collect all publications produced by them between 2008 and August 2022. Results were separated into two categories: Publications during training and Publications post-training. Results: As defined above, 156 Surgeons were analyzed for publications during training and post-training. The mean number of publications was 7.02 ± 17.819 post-training vs. 2.47 ± 4.313 during training, P < 0.001. The range of publication post-training was 0-124 vs. 0-30 during training. Pearson correlation between the two groups resulted in a value of 0.654, P < 0.001. Conclusion: Higher research productivity while training correlates to higher productivity post-training, but overall Orthopaedic surgeons produce more research after training than during. With the growing importance of research, more mentorship, time, and resources must be dedicated to research to instill and foster greater participation while in training.

Sex Disparities Among Fellowship Program Directors in Orthopaedic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Women are underrepresented in the orthopaedic surgery workforce in the U.S. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the representation of women among fellowship program directors (PDs) in orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of fellowship PDs in orthopaedic surgery during the 2022 to 2023 academic year. Academic, training, and demographic characteristics were collected from internet-based resources. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated for both men and women. A PPR of <0.8 indicated underrepresentation and a PPR of >1.2 indicated overrepresentation. Bivariate analyses were utilized to assess the correlation between sex diversity and geographic region and between sex diversity and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accreditation status. The relationship between the median annual salary and the sex diversity of each orthopaedic subspecialty was analyzed with use of the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: This study included 600 fellowship PDs, 40 (6.7%) of whom were women. In total, 24.5% of the fellowship PDs were assistant professors (8.8% women versus 91.2% men, p < 0.001); 26.2% were associate professors (9.6% women versus 90.4% men, p < 0.001); 36.8% were full professors (4.5% women versus 95.5% men, p < 0.001); and 12.5% were unranked (2.7% women versus 97.3% men, p < 0.001). The representation of women increased with academic rank, as reflected in their prevalence at the assistant (PPR = 0.67), associate (PPR = 0.77), and full professor (PPR = 0.80) levels. Among the orthopaedic subspecialties, musculoskeletal oncology (19.0%), pediatric orthopaedics (14.6%), and hand surgery (12.6%) had the highest proportions of women fellowship PDs. PPRs were lowest for orthopaedic sports medicine (PPR = 0.35), shoulder and elbow (PPR = 0.45), and adult reconstruction (PPR = 0.52). Women PDs had equitable representation in musculoskeletal oncology (PPR = 1.17), hand surgery (PPR = 1.02), foot and ankle (PPR = 0.84), and orthopaedic trauma (PPR = 0.80). Median subspecialty compensation was negatively correlated with the prevalence of women among fellowship PDs (r = -0.70, p = 0.036). Geographic region was not associated with sex diversity (p = 0.434), but programs with ACGME accreditation had significantly more women fellowship PDs than those without (11.0% versus 3.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women are underrepresented among orthopaedic fellowship PDs, especially in certain subspecialties (orthopaedic sports medicine, shoulder and elbow, and adult reconstruction). More research is needed to understand the barriers that impact the representation of women among leadership positions in orthopaedic surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Greater sex diversity among fellowship PDs may help to increase the recruitment of women into orthopaedic subspecialties. The equitable consideration of orthopaedic surgeons from all backgrounds for leadership positions can increase workforce diversity, which may improve the vitality of the orthopaedic community.

Preference Signaling Survey of Program Directors-After the Match.

INTRODUCTION: The 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic residency cycle implemented a preference signaling program (PSP), allowing applicants to send "signals" to up to 30 programs to demonstrate their genuine interest. With the conclusion of the 2022 to 2023 cycle, the primary purpose of this study was to analyze program director (PD) perceptions of the PSP after the match cycle and provide a retrospective evaluation of the effects of the PSP on the orthopaedic resident selection process. METHODS: A 21-question survey was distributed to 98 PDs (32.7% response rate). Contact information was obtained from a national database. RESULTS: Most respondents (96.9%) participated in the American Orthopaedic Association's PSP. The majority (93.7%) view preference signaling as a positive change. Most PDs (56.2%) reported a decreased number in applications received compared with previous years. Receiving a preference signal was ranked among the most important factors in resident selection, and most PDs agreed that preference signaling should be used to screen applicants (84.4%) and differentiate similar applicants (96.8%). Moreover, 65.6% of PDs indicated that they would not rank or invite applicants to interview without a signal or completion of a formal away rotation. PDs report that in the 2022 to 2023 cycle, 98.5% of applicants who matched at their program had sent a preference signal. DISCUSSION: Preference signaling was one of the most important factors assessed during its inaugural application cycle and is anticipated to remain a key tool for screening and differentiating candidates. Applicants should strategically select signal recipients to enhance their success in the match.

Barriers to Entry: Socioeconomic Discrepancies Between Unmatched First-Time Applicants and Reapplicants in the Field of Orthopaedic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic surgery remains a competitive surgical subspecialty with more applicants than spots each year. As a result, numerous students fail to match into these competitive positions each year with a growing number of reapplicants in consecutive application cycles. We sought to understand the socioeconomic factors at play between this growing reapplicant pool compared with first-time applicants to better understand potential discrepancies between these groups. Our hypothesis is that reapplicants would have higher socioeconomic status and have less underrepresented minority representation compared with successful first-time applicants. METHODS: A retrospective review of deidentified individual orthopaedic surgery applicant data from the American Association of Medical Colleges was reviewed from 2011 to 2021. Individual demographic and application data as well as self-reported socioeconomic and parental data were analyzed using descriptive and advanced statistics. RESULTS: Of the 12,112 applicants included in this data set, 77% were first-time applicants (61% versus 17% successfully entered into an orthopaedic surgery residency vs versus unmatched, respectively), whereas 22% were reapplicants. In successful first-time applicants, 12% identified as underrepresented minorities in medicine. The proportion of underrepresented minorities was significantly higher among unmatched first-time applicants (20%) and reapplicants (25%) ( P < 0.001). Reapplicants (mean = $83,364) and unmatched first-time applicants (mean = $80,174) had less medical school debt compared with first time applicants (mean = $101,663) ( P < 0.001). More than 21% of reapplicants were found to have parents in healthcare fields, whereas only 16% of successful first-time applicants and 15% of unsuccessful first-applicants had parents in health care ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reapplicants to orthopaedic surgery residency have less educational debt and are more likely to have parental figures in a healthcare field compared with first-time applicants. This suggests the discrepancies in socioeconomic status between reapplicants and first-time applicants and the importance of providing resources for reapplicants.

Increasing Burden of Upper-Extremity Fractures in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA): A 30-Year Analysis of the Epidemiology and Causes of Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Upper-extremity fractures (UEFs) account for a large proportion of bone fractures and are costly to both health and the economy. The fracture burden in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is influenced by the region's diverse cultural, economic, and political status. This study examined UEF epidemiology and causes across the MENA region and within the 21 MENA countries as categorized by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data set. METHODS: On the basis of GBD data, this study evaluated the epidemiology of UEFs from 1990 to 2019. The causes of injuries, incidence, number of years of healthy life lost due to disability (YLD), and their association with the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) were obtained and calculated for males and females in all age groups. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2019, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of UEFs in the MENA region increased by 2.33%, to 1,086.39 per 100,000 people, and the YLD rate increased 15.69%, to 9.17 per 100,000, opposing the global decreasing trends. Fractures of the radius and/or ulna had the highest ASIR (505.32 per 100,000) of all UEF types in 2019. The clavicle, scapula, and humerus had the highest increasing trend among the fracture sites. In 2019, Saudi Arabia had the highest ASIR of UEFs (2,296.93 per 100,000). Afghanistan had the highest age-standardized YLD rate due to UEFs (19.6 per 100,000) in 2019, with Syria (153.32%) and Iran (37.04%) experiencing the greatest increase and decrease, respectively, from 1990 to 2019. Falling was the leading cause of UEFs, accounting for 45.05% of incidence and 41.19% of YLD overall. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to global trends, UEFs increased in the MENA region during the study period. Countries with higher fracture incidence and YLD should consider preventive and rehabilitation strategies.

Using a Modern Linked Research Database to Examine Gender Disparities in Orthopaedic Grant Funding from 2010 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: Gender disparities in research grant funding persist in many disciplines. With use of the Dimensions database, we sought to examine the extent of gender disparities in U.S. orthopaedic grant funding from 2010 onward. Our aim was to provide insights into the extent of gender disparities in the field of orthopaedic research and to highlight the potential need for future action to address these disparities. METHODS: Using orthopaedic-related search terms, we queried all U.S. grants awarded for orthopaedic research from 2010 to 2022. A total of 22,326 results were then manually screened to exclude those without a direct focus on orthopaedic research. The amounts received per principal investigator were reported in U.S. dollars and adjusted for inflation. Author gender was predicted with use of the Genderize.io algorithm application programming interface. The iCite Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) was utilized to assess the impact of the publications linked to each grant. RESULTS: A total of 1,723 grants were included. Men principal investigators received significantly higher median funding per grant in 2011, 2012, and 2013; however, this trend reversed with women receiving nonsignificantly higher funding in 2015, 2017, 2018, 2021, and 2022. In 2020, women received significantly higher median funding per grant than men ($166,234 versus $121,384; p = 0.04). Throughout the 13-year period, men principal investigators accounted for approximately 71% of grants, with a very weak increasing trend in the percent of grants attributed to women (R 2 = 0.16; p < 0.001). Grants with men principal investigators resulted in more publications than those with women principal investigators (mean publications, 11.1 versus 6.6; p = 0.001). Publications resulting from grants awarded to men had a significantly higher mean RCR than those resulting from grants awarded to women (2.42 versus 2.09; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the median amounts of funding per grant awarded to men and to women in 7 of the past 8 years, despite significantly greater funding per grant having been awarded to men from 2011 to 2013. Men principal investigators accounted for the majority of grants received during the study period, although this proportion was lower than the proportion of men among orthopaedic surgeons in 2022. This study could inform initiatives aimed at promoting equity in grant funding for orthopaedic research.

Perception and Usage of Social Media Among Women in Orthopaedics.

INTRODUCTION: The use of social media for marketing, education, and networking has increased among orthopaedic surgeons. Social media has played an important role in supporting women physicians and trainees, by allowing connections to be made across stages of training and geographic borders. The purpose of this study was to determine the perceptions of female orthopaedic surgeons, fellows, residents, and medical students regarding their usage of social media. METHODS: A 22-question anonymous survey regarding the perceptions of social media usage was distributed to 1,189 female members of Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society via e-mail in July 2022. Data collection lasted a total of 4 weeks, from July to August 2022. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 207 responses were received (17% response rate). The respondents comprised 90 orthopaedic surgeons (43%), 60 medical students (29%), 49 residents (24%), and eight fellows (4%). Ninety one percent of participants (189 of 207) reported having a social media account, with 23% (43 of 189) having separate 'personal' and 'professional' accounts. Less than half of all participants reported altering (51 of 189; 27%) or deleting (20 of 189; 11%) profiles for interviews. Fifty three percent of participants (109 of 207) 'agreed' that social media is a good way to network. Twenty eight percent of participants (58 of 207) feared gaining attention to their profile when engaging with professional accounts. Forty percent of participants (62 of 207) agreed that personal life events on social media can be considered unprofessional and should be kept on a private profile. CONCLUSION: Social media can be used to network professionally within orthopaedic surgery, connecting women at different levels of training. Although concerns about professionalism of social media accounts exist, this may be mitigated by maintaining a separate private account from a public, professional profile. Future guidelines regarding social media usage and how to maintain professionalism while being active on social media may be beneficial.

Epidemiologic trends in hand injuries in the National Football League from 2009-2010 to 2019-2020.

OBJECTIVES: In American football, hand injuries have been shown to negatively impact performance. The purpose of this study is to characterize the prevalence and severity of hand injuries in National Football League (NFL) players. METHODS: A public online database was utilized to identify hand injuries in NFL players from 2009-2010 to 2019-2020. The primary outcome was to analyze the overall incidence of hand injuries (including wrist, metacarpus, finger, and thumb), injury type by each aforementioned anatomic location, and player position. Injury severity was evaluated based on percentage of injuries in which players returned to play (RTP), number of games missed before RTP, and the percentage of injuries resulting in the player being placed on injured reserve (IR). RESULTS: Of the 6,127 players included, 847 (13.8%) players sustained a hand injury, of which 24.8%, 34.3%, 17.9%, and 22.9% occurred at the wrist, metacarpus, finger, and thumb, respectively. Of the injured players, 97.4% returned to play following their injury, 14.8% were put on IR, and an average of 1.7 (SD 3.3) games were missed. Quarterbacks were the most likely to sustain hand injuries at all anatomic locations. Wrist injuries were associated with the lowest RTP rate (93.3%), the most players placed on injured reserve (28.6%), and the greatest number of games missed (mean 2.5, SD 4.2). CONCLUSION: Hand injuries decreased in prevalence by 65.6% over the 11 NFL seasons evaluated. This trend coincides with the implementation of several safety rules that relate to components of play involving the hands. Quarterbacks experienced the greatest prevalence and severity for all hand injuries. Wrist injuries represent the anatomic location associated with the greatest severity. These findings may be able to inform tailored injury prevention practices by position, and advocate for the further adoption of safety rules to protect players from further injury.

The Mentee Perspective: Evaluating Mentorship of Medical Students in the Field of Orthopaedic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Mentorship is an invaluable facet of medical education. The purpose of this study was to analyze medical student perspectives of mentorship they received and the influence this has on their participation in the field of orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of medical students interested in pursuing orthopaedic surgery through an 18-question survey distributed through social media and e-mail. RESULTS: Two hundred fifteen students completed this survey, with over 50% of students reporting that they have a mentor in orthopaedic surgery while 34% were actively seeking one. Most students found mentors through research opportunities (25%) and cold e-mails (20%). Common hurdles to mentorship were access (38%) and finding common time (30%). Peer mentorship had a higher mean satisfaction score in all domains, except facilitating matching, and there was a significant difference between groups (e.g., peer mentor versus program director; P < 0.001). Sex, race, and degree type were not significantly related to students' access to or their evaluation of mentors (P > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: Overall, this study demonstrates that medical students across the nation rely on mentorship to guide them on their path to becoming an orthopaedic surgeon.

Preoperative Anemia Is Associated With Worse Postoperative Outcomes After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia has been shown to be associated with complications after numerous orthopedic procedures. No studies to our knowledge have examined its impact on outcomes after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fracture (DRF). We hypothesized that patients with preoperative anemia would have increased likelihood of adverse outcomes, and likelihood would increase with severity of anemia. METHODS: A total of 14 136 patients underwent ORIF for DRF over 2012-2021, identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were classified by World Health Organization criteria as nonanemic (hematocrit >36% for women, >39% for men), mildly anemic (hematocrit 33%-36% for women, 33%-39% for men), or moderately to severely anemic (hematocrit <33% for women or men). Multivariable regressions adjusted for age, sex, race, and comorbidities statistically different between anemic and nonanemic patients were used to examine the effect of anemia on postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Mildly anemic patients had significantly longer length of stay and were significantly more likely to experience readmission and sepsis (P < .05 all). Moderately to severely anemic patients had significantly longer length of stay and were significantly more likely to experience readmission, postoperative transfusion, septic shock, and any adverse event (P < .05 all). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anemia is associated with increased likelihood of adverse outcomes after ORIF for DRF, and likelihood increases with severity of anemia. Surgeons should monitor patients for preoperative anemia and endeavor to identify the source of and, if safe and possible, correct the anemia preoperatively or manage and educate patients postoperatively.

What Factors Are Associated With Arterial Line-Related Limb Ischemia in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation? A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the development of arterial line-related limb ischemia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The authors also sought to characterize and report the outcomes of patients who developed arterial line-related limb ischemia. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single academic tertiary referral ECMO center. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients who were treated with ECMO over 6 years. INTERVENTIONS: Use of arterial line. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 278 consecutive ECMO patients were included, with 19 (7%) patients developing arterial line-related limb ischemia during the ECMO run. Postcannulation Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.32), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95), and adjusted Vasopressor Dose Equivalence (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) scores were independently associated with the development of arterial line-associated limb ischemia. A SOFA score of ≥17 at the time of ECMO cannulation had an 80% sensitivity and 87% specificity for predicting arterial line-related limb ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial line-related limb ischemia is much more common in ECMO patients than in the typical intensive care unit setting. The SOFA score may be useful in identifying which patients may be at risk for arterial line-related limb ischemia. As this was a single-center retrospective study, these results are inherently exploratory, and prospective multicenter studies are necessary to validate these results.

The Importance of Perceived Barriers to Women Entering and Advancing in Orthopaedic Surgery in the US and Beyond.

BACKGROUND: Global perceptions of barriers to women in orthopaedics have not been assessed. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of international barriers to women entering and advancing within orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: An anonymous, online survey was distributed to women medical students, trainees, and practicing surgeons via Women in Orthopaedics Worldwide, the "Women in Ortho" Facebook page, and individual programmes. Participants were asked to rate perceived barriers to (1) pursuing training and (2) career advancement on a scale of 1-5, with 5 being the most important and relative to other barriers. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were employed. RESULTS: The survey yielded 237 US (84.0%) and 45 international (16.0%) respondents. Per entering orthopaedic surgery, the most important barriers were male-dominated culture, lack of a strong women mentor, and lack of female representation at home institution. Compared with the US surgeons/trainees, international respondents cited greater societal disapproval (2.8 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.3, P = 0.01). Medical students assigned less importance to lack of exposure, more to lack of resources for creating competitive applications (P < 0.05). Regarding career advancement, lack of women leadership, family responsibilities, and gender-biased selection for promotion were the most important. International surgeons/trainees noted greater concern for societal disapproval (3.5 ± 1.5 vs. 2.6 ± 1.3, P = 0.003) and were more likely to rank sexual harassment in their top three (17.6 vs. 4.2%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: While notable differences exist, there is striking similarity across countries and position levels in perceived barriers to women entering and advancing in orthopaedic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Trends in Distal Radius Fixation Reimbursement, Charge, and Utilization in the Medicare Population.

Background Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the second most common fragility fracture experienced by the elderly, and surgical management constitutes an appreciable sum of Medicare expenditure for upper extremity surgery. Using Medicare data from 2012 to 2017, our primary aim was to describe temporal changes in surgical treatment, physician payment, and patient charges for DRF fixation. Methods We examined surgical volumes and retrospective patient charge (services billed by surgeon) and surgeon payment (professional fee) data from 2012 to 2017 for four DRF surgeries: closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of extra-articular fractures, ORIF of intra-articular (IA) (2-fragment) fractures, and ORIF of IA (> 3 fragments) fractures. The reimbursement ratio was defined and calculated as the ratio of charges to payment. Rates were adjusted for inflation using the annual consumer-price index. Results For these four surgeries from 2012 to 2017, total patient charges grew by 64% from $117 to 193 million, while surgeon payment grew by 42% from $30 to 42 million. CRPP cases fell by 47%, while ORIF increased by 17, 14, and 45% for extra-articular, IA (2-fragment), and IA (> 3 fragments) surgeries, respectively. After adjusting for inflation, payment to physicians increased by more than or equal to 16% for all procedures except for CRPP, which fell by 2%. Charges during this same period increased from 13 to 38%. Reimbursement ratios declined from -9.2% to -13% for each procedure. Conclusion From 2012 to 2017, while charges have outpaced surgeon payment, payment has outpaced inflation for all forms of distal radius ORIF, aside from CRPP. There has been a continued sharp decline of CRPP. Level of Evidence is III, economic.

Match Rates Among Underrepresented Minority and Female Applicants to Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs from 2011 to 2021: How Are We Doing?

Background: Orthopaedic surgery residency programs have traditionally had less representation of underrepresented minority (URM) and female trainees compared with other medical specialties. Widespread efforts have been implemented to increase the diversity of orthopaedic surgery residency programs; however, it is not known whether URM and female applicants are increasingly likely to match as a result. Thus, we aimed to study the independent association between URM and female applicants and matching into orthopaedic surgery over the past decade. Methods: Applicant-level data from the Electronic Residency Application Service were reviewed from 2011 to 2021 with variables including demographic variables, URM status, and matriculation to an orthopaedic surgery residency program. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the likelihood of matriculating into orthopaedic surgery when controlling for number of applications, top 40 medical school status, AOA status, and MD/other degree. Results: Twelve thousand one hundred eleven applicants were identified from 2011 to 2021 with a match rate of 70% overall. Two thousand fifty-six applicants (17%) were female and 1,926 (16%) classified as URM. The total number of applications increased from 1,074 in 2011 to 1,229 in 2021. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) associated with matching among all applicants decreased from 0.75 in 2011 to 0.64 in 2021, p < 0.001, and the OR of non-URM male and female applicants also decreased (female: 0.79-0.69, p < 0.001; male: 0.78-0.65, p < 0.001). The OR of URM male applicants did not change significantly (0.57-0.55, p = 0.60). The OR for URM female applicants, however, increased significantly from 0.46 to 0.61, p < 0.001. Over the entire time frame, the odds of matching were significantly lower for URM applicants compared with non-URM applicants (both male and female). Conclusions: Overall, the adjusted odds ratio of matching into orthopaedic surgery among female URM applicants has increased over the past decade, indicating successful efforts to improve the diversity of orthopaedic surgery training programs. The odds of URM male applicants have remained relatively constant, and the odds of URM male and female applicants were significantly lower than all non-URM applicants. Level of Evidence: III.

A Comparison of Match Rates to Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs Between First-Time Versus Repeat Applicants: An Analysis of the National Resident Matching Program Data from 2018 to 2022.

Orthopaedic surgery has become one of the most competitive specialties to match into among medical students applying to residency. The purpose of this study was to compare match rates to orthopaedic surgery residency programs among first-time vs. repeat applicants. Methods: Data were obtained from the National Resident Matching Program from 2018 to 2022. For each year, the total number of applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs was obtained, as well as the number of applicants who successfully matched into orthopaedics. The match rate was compared between first-time vs repeat applicants. A subanalysis was performed on allopathic graduates (MDs) and osteopathic graduates (DOs)/international medical graduates (IMGs). In addition, the match rate for first-time applicants and reapplicants was compared between MD and DO/IMG applicants. Results: Overall, there was a significantly higher match rate among first-time applicants (89.8%) vs. repeat applicants (22.5%, p < 0.0001). When substratified by MD and DO/IMG applicants, first-time applicants still matched at a significantly higher rate than reapplicants within each group (p < 0.0001 for each). Among first-time applicants, MDs (93.1%) matched at a significantly higher rate than DOs/IMGs (68.6%, p < 0.0001). Among reapplicants, DOs/IMGs (25.3%) matched at a significantly higher rate than MDs (20.1%, p < 0.01). Conclusion: First-time applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs have a significantly higher rate of matching compared with reapplicants, irrespective of degree. In recent years, first-time MD applicants have matched at a significantly higher rate than first-time DO/IMG applicants.

Selective Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Denervation Versus Trapeziectomy and Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition for Painful Arthritis: A Prospective Study With 2 Years of Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint denervation is a relatively novel method for the management of osteoarthritis-associated pain by selective transection of articular nerve branches of the CMC joint. This study compared functional/patient-reported outcomes after CMC denervation with those after trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (T + LRTI) over a 2-year follow-up period. We hypothesized that the outcomes of denervation and T + LRTI would be similar over the course of the study and at the final 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Adults with Eaton stage 2-4 disease, no evidence of CMC subluxation, and no history of thumb injury/surgery were included. Pain scores, brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ), Kapandji score, 2-point discrimination, and grip/key/3-point pinch strength were measured at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months after surgery. On average, T + LRTI patients underwent 7 weeks of splinting, with release to full activity at 3 months; denervation patients were placed in a soft postoperative dressing for 2 weeks, with release to full activity as tolerated at 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-three denervation and 20 T + LRTI patients were included. Preoperative characteristics were similar between both groups. Two denervation patients underwent secondary T + LRTI during the study period; one denervation patient underwent fat grafting to the CMC joint at an outside institution. Data prior to secondary surgeries were included in the analysis. The average tourniquet times (minutes) for denervation and T + LRTI were 43.5 ± 11.8 and 82.7 ± 14.2 minutes, respectively. For denervation and T + LRTI, the postoperative bMHQ scores were significantly higher than those at baseline at all time points. No significant differences were found between both groups for bMHQ, sensation, or strength measures. CONCLUSIONS: Carpometacarpal denervation is well tolerated, with shorter tourniquet times and faster return to full activity than T + LRTI. For the study cohort, the conversion rate to T + LRTI at 2 years was 9%. Both procedures demonstrated durable improvement in bMHQ compared with the preoperative state with similar long-term outcomes over 2 years of follow-up. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

The Effect of Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections on Vaccine Efficacy: A Current Concepts Review.

Orthopedic surgeons commonly perform corticosteroid injections. These injections have systemic side effects, including suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis. Due to this suppression, there is a theoretical risk of corticosteroid injections affecting the efficacy of the novel COVID-19 vaccines. This potential interaction led the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons to recommend, "avoiding musculoskeletal corticosteroid injections for two weeks before and one week after COVID vaccine administration." This review examines the literature underlying this recommendation. An extensive literature review was performed through PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar from database inception to May 2022. Keywords searched were COVID, coronavirus, vaccine, vaccination, steroids, and corticosteroids. Search results included articles written in the English language and encompassed reviews, case series, empirical studies, and basic science articles. There is no definitive evidence that corticosteroid injections affect COVID-19 vaccine efficacy or increase the risk of contracting COVID. The authors recommend orthopedic surgeons follow the AAOS guidelines, which recommend avoiding injections two weeks before and one week following COVID vaccine administration. Additional research is needed to better define this theoretical risk, especially since there is good evidence that injections suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis.

Women Are Underrepresented Among Principal Investigators of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Clinical Trials in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Leadership of clinical trials confers national recognition and promotes academic advancement. We hypothesized that women would be underrepresented among principal investigators (PIs) of hip and knee arthroplasty clinical trials in the United States. METHODS: A query of hip and knee arthroplasty clinical trials from 2015 to 2021 was performed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical trials were included if they involved a U.S.-based orthopaedic-surgeon PI. We analyzed the sex representation of arthroplasty PIs among junior-level (assistant professor) and senior-level (associate or full professor) faculty. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated by comparing the sex representation among arthroplasty PIs with that among academic arthroplasty faculty at institutions conducting hip and knee arthroplasty clinical trials. A PPR of <0.8 indicated underrepresentation and a PPR of >1.2 indicated overrepresentation. RESULTS: A total of 157 clinical trials involving 192 arthroplasty PIs were included. Of these PIs, only 2 (1.0%) were women. PIs were mostly funded by academic institutions (66%) and industry (33%). U.S. federal sources funded a minority (1%) of PIs. Of the 243 male arthroplasty faculty who were eligible, 190 men (78.2%) served as PIs. In contrast, of the 17 female arthroplasty faculty who were eligible, only 2 women (11.8%) served as PIs (p < 0.001). Across the entire cohort of arthroplasty PIs, women were underrepresented (PPR = 0.16), whereas men were equitably represented (PPR = 1.06). Women were underrepresented at the assistant professor (PPR = 0.0), associate professor (PPR = 0.52), and full professor (PPR = 0.58) levels. CONCLUSIONS: Women were underrepresented among PIs of hip and knee arthroplasty clinical trials, which may lead to disparities in academic promotion and advancement. More research is needed to understand the potential barriers to female leadership of clinical trials. Greater awareness and engagement are needed to create sex equity in clinical trial leadership for hip and knee arthroplasty research. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The underrepresentation of women among arthroplasty PIs may lead to fewer options in surgical providers for patients and may limit access to musculoskeletal care for certain patient populations. A diverse arthroplasty workforce can promote attention to issues that disproportionately affect historically underrepresented and vulnerable patient populations.